Express logo
Google
 
 
 
  NEWSLINES
 
 
  NL ARCHIVE
   Search by Date
  SERVICES
 
  National News
  Express classifieds
  Express Astrology
  Personalised Predictions
  Subscribe to The Indian Express North American Edition
  CHANNELS
 
  Astrology
  Shopping
  Classifieds
  Estates
  Money
  Travel
  GROUP SITES
 
  Express India
  Indian Express
  Financial Express
  Screen
  Kashmir Live
  Live Cricket
  Loksatta
  Lokprabha
  North American
Edition [Print]
  COLUMNISTS
 
  The Indian Express
  The Financial Express
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
  Free Newsletter
  Wireless Express
  SYNDICATIONS
 
  RSS FeedsRSS Feeds
 
 
Dotted line
Dotted line
 
NEWS
 
SMS not sent: Hutch told to pay up
Express News Service

New Delhi, July 21: A consumer court today ordered service provider Hutch to pay Rs 30,000 compensation for mental agony and harassment after it charged one of its customers for undelivered short messages (SMS).

Disposing off a petition filed by Dharam Pal Gupta, the North Delhi Consumer Forum clarified that cell-phone customers should not be made to pay for undelivered messages.

Advertisement
‘‘SMS involves not only sending the message of the subscriber. The service charges can be taken only after delivering the message... To discontinue such unfair trade for all times to come, this forum orders that Hutch will not, henceforth, debit the subscriber with SMS charges until the message is delivered,” the forum said in its order.

In July last year, Gupta tried to download ringtones through his Hutch phone (No. 9811525341). He failed to receive a tone despite sending repeated messages to a four digit number. Although, Hutch is one of the service providers supporting the service, he complained that not only did he not receive the tones but also Hutch deleted Rs 45 from his account.

Hutch filed a reply saying that in such cases, the charges are levied by ringtone providers such Indiatimes and Yahoo and that it cannot be held responsible for deficiency of service on their part. The court, however, dismissed this argument and pointed out that the customer’s contract is with the service provider and not with its associates.

‘‘Hutch cannot absolve itself from legal obligations to provide services to the subscriber merely because it has arrangements with other companies for further the further transmission of the message,’’ it observed.

The court also reprimanded Hutch for ignoring Gupta’s complaint on its customer care number. On hearing the complaint, Gupta alleged, one of the company’s employee told him that he did not have time for grievances involving such ‘‘trifle’’ amounts and reportedly said he spends that much money on soft-drinks everyday.

The forum also ordered the firm to display on the cell screen the time at which the message was sent and the time at which it was delivered.





write
Write to the Editor
mail
Mail this Story
print
Print this Story
 
Search News
 
Dotted line
Dotted line
 
More News Headlines

Bullet Heritage sites to get looks they deserve
Bullet New power minister cracks whip on discoms
Bullet City gets a first: a full-fledged nursing college
Bullet Kingpin of fake sting on MPs still at large
Bullet Ex-registrar of Planning and Architecture school reinstated
Bullet Assembly’s monsoon session begins today
Bullet Making life miserable for someone to take his own life is not abetment, rules HC