Express logo
Google
 
 
 
  NEWSLINES
 
 
  NL ARCHIVE
   Search by Date
  SERVICES
 
  National News
  Express classifieds
  Express Astrology
  Personalised Predictions
  Subscribe to The Indian Express North American Edition
  CHANNELS
 
  Astrology
  Shopping
  Classifieds
  Estates
  Money
  Travel
  GROUP SITES
 
  Express India
  Indian Express
  Financial Express
  Screen
  Kashmir Live
  Live Cricket
  Loksatta
  Lokprabha
  North American
Edition [Print]
  COLUMNISTS
 
  The Indian Express
  The Financial Express
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
  Free Newsletter
  Wireless Express
  SYNDICATIONS
 
  RSS FeedsRSS Feeds
 
 
Dotted line
Dotted line
 
PAGE ONE
 

TELL THEM YOU KNOW

Rs 50 as appeal fee? Officials have no info
The RTI Act says no fee while appealing against information denial, but officials keep asking for it
Mahesh Langa

Ahmedabad, October 21: WHEN Natubhai Barot of Prantij wanted to file an appeal before the District Development Officer (DDO) of Sabarkantha because he had been denied the information he had sought, the DDO asked him to pay Rs 50 as ‘‘appeal fee’’. That was on October 10.

The incident is not a singular one. There are other instances, too, where information officers have demanded Rs 50 as ‘‘appeal fee’’ whenever a member of the public has approached them for filing an appeal against information denial. But the rules framed by the State government for the implementation of the Right to Information (RTI) Act has not laid down any provision for ‘‘appeal fee’’.

Advertisement
Like the Prantij incident, the public information officer (PIO) of Surat collectorate asked Natavaralal Desai to pay Rs 50 fee with his appeal application in June; Primary Education Committee of AMC asked Narendra Upadhyay to pay Rs 50 as appeal fee in January; and Rajkot Municipal Corporation asked several applicants to pay the appeal fee in March.

According to State Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) R N Das, no fee is required to be paid for appeal. ‘‘There is no provision for any fee at the time of appeal. Under the RTI Act, only at the time of seeking information one needs to pay Rs 20 as fee. But that too has been exempted for those living below the poverty line (BPL),’’ said Das.

In another incident, the office of Jamnagar Superintendent of Police mentioned in its specimen form if the applicant had paid the appeal fee or not. Besides, the SP has prescribed a specific format for appeal.

But the rules framed by the State government say otherwise. Section 8 of the rule book says: ‘‘For the purpose of removing any doubt, it is hereby clarified that the form as prescribed under these rules needs not be an authorised preprinted stationery but any format neatly typed, hand-written or any electronic form which covers essential details prescribed in the form shall be valid.’’

The RTI is now one year old, but such teething problems still persist at certain levels where fees are demanded or prescribed forms are insisted upon.

According to Harinesh Pandya of Gujarat Right to Information Initiative (GRII), during the formulation of draft rules for RTI, Rs 50 as appeal fee was suggested but while finalising the rules that proposed clause was done away with. ‘‘But the government has not communicated the final rules effectively to the officials concerned,’’ he said.

As a result, there is no clarity at the local level about whether any fee to be charged and whether any format other than the prescribed one is valid. So much so that in September, the Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation (BMC) had to write a letter to the State CIC seeking his opinion on the appeal fee.

At the time of initiating the implementation of of the RTI Act, the government had made Sardar Patel Institute of Public Administration (SPIPA) as the nodal agency to train government officials on the functions of the law. But problems started when those senior officials who got training at SPIPA did not impart the same to their subordinates.

According to Rahul Mangaokar, an RTI activist, those who have been trained at SPIPA have not provided training to their subordinates. ‘‘Trickling down of training is not happening in the State,’’ he said.





write
Write to the Editor
mail
Mail this Story
print
Print this Story
 
Search News
 
Dotted line
Dotted line
 
More Page One Headlines

Bullet Sujalam scheme not feasible: Experts
Bullet Modi spent Rs 5 cr on mahila sammelans
Bullet Little Mermaids of Sabarmati
Bullet Trader sends property papers and jewellery to SDA; ‘Pay my debts’