Express logo
Google
 
 
 
  NEWSLINES
 
 
  NL ARCHIVE
   Search by Date
  SERVICES
 
  National News
  Express classifieds
  Express Astrology
  Personalised Predictions
  Subscribe to The Indian Express North American Edition
  CHANNELS
 
  Astrology
  Shopping
  Classifieds
  Estates
  Money
  Travel
  GROUP SITES
 
  Express India
  Indian Express
  Financial Express
  Screen
  Kashmir Live
  Live Cricket
  Loksatta
  Lokprabha
  North American
Edition [Print]
  COLUMNISTS
 
  The Indian Express
  The Financial Express
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
  Free Newsletter
  Wireless Express
  SYNDICATIONS
 
  RSS FeedsRSS Feeds
 
 
Dotted line
Dotted line
 
NEWS
 
MP challenges Air-India’s safety norms
Sanjay Raut says the airline has pilots lacking minimum command hours, putting passenger lives at risk.
Express News Service

Mumbai, March 29: THE Bombay High Court on Wednesday directed Air-India (A-I) to file an affidavit before April 5, in response to a public interest litigation filed by Member of Parliament Sanjay Raut, challenging the air safety standards followed by the airline.

Raut, who is also a member of the Civil Aviation Consultative Committee and Editor of Shiv Sena mouthpiece Saamna, has raised concerns about air crew training standards and duty times of pilots.

Advertisement
Raut says A-I continues to violate safety norms and put passenger lives at risk even after he raised the issue with the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA).

The petition asks for strict action against A-I officials including Chairman and Managing Director V Thulasidas and Director (Operations) M K Hathi.

Raut quotes a DGCA document called the Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR) and says A-I is violating CAR rules on approval of instructors, examiners and check pilots.

CAR rules specify a minimum of 1,000 hours of command experience to qualify as instructors. The CAR allows the stipulation to be relaxed to 500 hours if the pilot has instructional experience of 200 hours.

The petition says that, in December 2004, Hathi wrote to the DGCA asking for a relaxation of the 500+200 rule for A-I. When the DGCA did not reply, a similar letter was resent in June 2005.

In October 2004, senior instructors had written to A-I complaining about the CAR violation and had pointed out serious compromises in procedure. The DGCA rejected A-I’s rule relaxation request.

‘‘Apart from this, there is also the issue of the number of flying hours for pilots,’’ said Raut’s lawyer K P Anil Kumar. ‘‘These issues have also been raised in Parliament.’’





write
Write to the Editor
mail
Mail this Story
print
Print this Story
 
Search News
 
Dotted line
Dotted line
 
More News Headlines

Bullet MHADA likely to take over Shivshahi Punarvasan Prakalp
Bullet City coastline dying, air pollution on the rise: Report
Bullet MIAL: 276 acres under encroachments
Bullet Conservancy staff protest against delay in payment
Bullet Shivaji Park murder: Residents express shock
Bullet Police informer had been receiving threats, say kin
Bullet Rubina Memon could be out of jail by Thursday: Lawyer