Express logo
Google
 
 
 
  NEWSLINES
 
 
  NL ARCHIVE
   Search by Date
  SERVICES
 
  National News
  Express classifieds
  Express Astrology
  Personalised Predictions
  Subscribe to The Indian Express North American Edition
  CHANNELS
 
  Astrology
  Shopping
  Classifieds
  Estates
  Money
  Travel
  GROUP SITES
 
  Express India
  Indian Express
  Financial Express
  Screen
  Kashmir Live
  Live Cricket
  Loksatta
  Lokprabha
  North American
Edition [Print]
  COLUMNISTS
 
  The Indian Express
  The Financial Express
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
  Free Newsletter
  Wireless Express
  SYNDICATIONS
 
  RSS FeedsRSS Feeds
 
 
Dotted line
Dotted line
 
PAGE ONE
 

TELL THEM YOU KNOW

RUB THAT IN
Officials with pursed lips get away unscathed
Express News Service

New Delhi, October 19: Mohan Singh, a Munirka resident, filed an RTI application on June 2 on the upkeep of park walls in his locality. When he didn’t get a reply, he appealed to the Public Grievances Commission (PGC). So far no penalty has been imposed on any official.

Rajiv, who lives in Seemapuri, had submitted three applications on sanitation and maintenance of parks in the area. Though he has approached the PGC, no information has been released. The officials responsible have also not been penalised.

Advertisement
These are just two of several instances in which information has been denied and no action has been taken against the officials responsible.

Arvind Kejriwal of Parivartan, the NGO that’s campaigning for implementation of the Right to Information Act, says ‘‘the fear of law will not be there unless officials responsible are penalised’’.

Section 9 (2) of RTI Act says when ‘‘a person responsible to supply information fails to furnish information asked for within the time specified or furnishes wrong information, he shall be liable after inquiry for imposition of penalty’’.

Maharashtra government enacted its right to information law a year ago and they have already punished 20 officials, says Kejriwal, adding ‘‘but in Delhi, the PGC has not imposed penalty in any case so far’’.

In fact, an executive order was issued in April this year by Shailaja Chandra, who was then the chief secretary. It said: ‘‘The PGC will be quantifying the amount of penalty to be imposed which will be recoverable from the competent authority.’’

Chandra, however, argues that ‘‘penalty can be imposed only after an inquiry and will have to be done by the disciplinary authority. I can only recommend. The authority to execute the orders are different for different grades of officials.’’

‘‘If the officials belong to a slightly senior level, the authority could be chief secretary, at higher levels it is the L-G and the seniormost officials can be dealt with by the home ministry,’’ she said.

‘‘I don’t want to recommend in any instance where it becomes another file in the Government. I have found three-four instances recently where there have been glaring delays by officials and have recommended action against them. I don’t want to take names but I am taking suo motu cognizance of these cases,’’ she said.





write
Write to the Editor
mail
Mail this Story
print
Print this Story
 
Search News
 
Dotted line
Dotted line
 
More Page One Headlines

Bullet Khurana sees sting for first time, ‘traumatised’ after meeting reporter
Bullet Month after Tarveen attack, cops now gun for lie-detector
Bullet Traffic cops track tech to curb speed demons
Bullet Police close foreigner death case, wife unhappy
Bullet Operation Golden Jubilee: MAMC museum to show the journey